Publication: Melbourne Herald
Date: 21 August 1922
The Prime Minister has again made use of his favorite word, "blithering." This time he remarks that there is "a lot of blithering rot being talked about cheap sugar."
Why the obsession for this one word, "blithering"? Is it believed to be more stern, more withering Than simple "bothering" or tren- chant "bosh"? Or more effective than good old "By gosh"? "Be jabers" may be somewhat out of court Because the men who use it are the sort Who're somewhat out of favor in some ways; And I'm not much inclined to "spare me days." There's "strike me pink" and "trifle me up a tree." But these trite phrases may appear to be Unwelcome to a cultured politician: Yet what's the matter with forth- right "Demnition"? What's wrong with "strike a light"? It merely seeks In my inherent manner, mild and meek, To aid our politicians with some phrase Far more innocuous than "Go to blazes!" I am a stickler for the pure in speech. I hate to hear a nation's leader screech, "Aw, 'ave a barth!" or "Git yer 'ead read! See?" Such phrases sound undignified to me. I am an advocate of graceful forms In orat'ry and, when a member warms Well to his subject, till he gets quite hot, I hate to hear him yell, "Aw, go to pot!" I don't object to "blithering" as a word; But its too frequent use becomes absurd. I think originality in slithering When one keeps on reiterating "Blithering." I'm ever altruistic; and this verse Is written to help members when they curse. . . . There's "blinded," "blooming," "blinking," "botheration." So thus I do my bit to aid the nation.