Publication: Melbourne Herald
Date: 31 May 1933
A hitch occurred at the Geneva Disarmament Conference over the definition of the word “aggressor.”
In old days, when the race was young, And man scarce knew his neighbor; When tales unwrit and songs unsung Awaited mankind’s labor; When men abode in caves and such Insanitary places, Words came unwieldy to the tongue— (At least, so hist’ry traces). And, in those days, some bloke named “Gah,” Replete with food and vigor, Came to his cave-mouth shouting, “Yah!” At some far distant nigger Across some primal valley which Ne’er knew the foot of rover, Because he felt that primal itch To “put his ego over.” The nigger on the other side Yelled back some term insulting; They both strode down in manly pride For victory exulting. They fought . . . . But which, of that old race— (Suppose you were assessor) Was the defendant in the case? And which was the aggressor? And so the years go on until We reach the Knights in Armor, And some cove, with a fighting will, Hears sneers about his charmer. His lance is couched! His foe defends! And there’s an awful ruction, Which is defender? . . . All depends On literal construction. We talk, we talk. Lord, how we talk! We point the ancient morals, And seek old remedies to caulk The leak of ancient quarrels. Words! Words! It’s all a world of words, Until, uncomprehended, We some day wake, poor human herds, To find all troubles mended.